Ordination trials
Most of you may know, I was examined by the Covenant
Presbytery credentials committee today, as one of the
final steps toward completing ordination. I was
approved by the committee, and will be recommended by
them for ordination.
Thank you for your prayers and support through this process. The final two steps are the oral exam before the entire Presbytery (on February 5), and the ordination service (date TBA). I look forward to finishing out this process, as it allows me to serve Hickory Withe Presbyterian Church as Pastor.
Thank you for your prayers and support through this process. The final two steps are the oral exam before the entire Presbytery (on February 5), and the ordination service (date TBA). I look forward to finishing out this process, as it allows me to serve Hickory Withe Presbyterian Church as Pastor.
|
Who's in charge here?
07/01/2008 14:02 Filed in: Ministry
For we do not preach ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake.
~II Corintians 4:5
Yesterday at lunch, Jack asked me, "Daddy-- are you in charge of part of the church?"
What a profound question! I'm thrilled that Jack is asking questions like this, and thinking about these things. I wonder how many people have actually thought about this question...
Here's how the rest of the dialogue went (roughly!):
Me: "Jack, daddy's job is to be the Pastor at the church, which is not about being in charge, it's about serving them."
Jack: "What does 'serving them' mean?"
Me: "It means that I help them when they need help, I encourage them if they are sad, and I teach them about Jesus and how He is what they need."
Jack: "Sometimes it seems like you're in charge..."
Me: "Well, sometimes people act like they want me to be in charge; but when they act like that, what they really want is for me to teach them how Jesus is in charge."
Jack: "That's good."
Working on a book
I talk a bit about my ambitions to write a book on
pastoral placement and transition. Read
More...
Wildlife Watch, 1/4/08
05/01/2008 09:33 Filed in: Personal
As I walked up the sidewalk this morning, I saw a doe
just inside the woods. If you didn't know to look over
there, and if the leaves hadn't mostly dropped, AND if
you didn't know what to look for, you would have missed
her. I felt pleased that I didn't.
Then not long after I arrived two does crossed the field behind the church. Lots of deer activity today!
Then not long after I arrived two does crossed the field behind the church. Lots of deer activity today!
More hands than I could ever shake...
03/01/2008 16:32 Filed in: Culture
"I reach into my pocket just so I can make some change, and I find more hands than I could ever shake..."
~John Gorka, "Campaign Trail"
The Iowa Caucus is today-- which is a big deal, and it's not. It's a big deal because it signals the beginning of the Presidential Primary elections-- where the various parties select which nominee will represent the party in the general election. It's not a big deal (or at least, not the big deal that the media makes it out to be) because the Iowa Caucus is just one state, and historically the winner of the Iowa Caucus has won the party nomination less than 50% of the time.
Of course, it does mark the beginning of the official election year-- which is a big deal in itself, on a larger scale than just one state. There are some twists in this year's election: those who seemed early on to be sure-things are now showing that they are anything but, while otherwise low-level contenders have emerged in prominence; former party loyalties are being tested in both parties; and this also seems to be the year of the "anyone but" election.
By that I mean even candidates are suggesting that others should not get the nomination at any cost. Dennis Kucinich announced something on the order of, "if you don't vote for me, then vote for Barack Obama" (suggesting that Hilary Clinton or John Edwards are not worthy of the nomination). Evangelicals seem to be against certain candidates more than they are for any one in particular. The endorsements seem to be more "vote against" than "vote for" statements.
To me, this signals a troubling time. Christians in particular ought to be more about asserting what we do believe, what we are for, and what we will support; we ought NOT stand so firmly about what we are against.
Historically, Christians have identified themselves by a credo, a creed. The word credo means, "I believe" and it always has a consequent-- a statement that follows asserting what the belief is. "I believe in God, the Father Almighty..." When we move away from this form and begin to argue what we don't believe, we often divide unnecessarily. In my brief studies of church history, I have seen how this is the case.
There are times when we must divide. Certainly, there have been ecclesiastical divisions that were necessary and important, even vital to the health of the church. Likewise, there are political perspectives that prevent the wholesale unity of all voters (though there have been times when this has at least not appeared to be so: Ronald Reagan was elected by landslide victories in both elections, with 49 states voting for him in 1984).
When a Christian identifies themselves to me more by what they don't believe than what they do, I wonder whether they really understand the Gospel; it is, after all, fundamentally about reconciliation and bridging division. My experience has taught me that, almost universally, Christians who are more about being against something will not have a pattern of healthy relationships with other Christians.
I wonder if a similar standard could apply to political candidates? As we enter into the 2008 election season, who is asserting firmly what they DO stand for? Who is spending more time telling you what (or who) they disagree with? I suggest to you that the candidates that spend their time, energy, and campaign dollars talking about what they won't do (or about how other candidates will be trouble) are not leaders who offer hope of a healthy presidency.
Haiku #7 (Christmastide Haiku)
03/01/2008 14:47 Filed in: Church Life
| Personal
Sermon Texts, January 2008
02/01/2008 09:15 Filed in: Church Life
One way I agree with the Federal Vision proponents
28/12/2007 11:30 Filed in: Theology
Systematic theology sometimes presents a false limit on
how we understand the terms and concepts of the Bible.
Read
More...
Wildlife Watch, 12/27/07
27/12/2007 16:11 Filed in: Personal
As I was walking out to the mailbox, about half-way up
the sidewalk, a large doe jumped out of the thicket
behind the big oak. She stopped and I stopped. We stood
there, looking at each other, for a few minutes-- then
she jumped off into the woods without looking back. She
showed no signs of fear or alert-- I guess the HWPC
grounds truly are a sanctuary!
I also saw a grey fox cross the field out back.
I also saw a grey fox cross the field out back.
Theological worldview quiz
27/12/2007 08:33 Filed in: Personal
I took a "theological worldview" quiz and here are the
results. What is your theological worldview?
Read
More...